Squid Game Boosts Netflix Value but Its Creator Receives Almost Nothing

The thrilling plot and provocative ideas of the Korean survival drama series Squid Game have captivated viewers all over the world. The enormous success of the show has not only received positive reviews but has also had a substantial financial impact on Netflix. A major debate about the creator’s compensation has emerged amid the joy of Squid Game’s success. This essay examines how Squid Game increased Netflix’s worth and sheds clarity on the convoluted subject of author pay in the entertainment sector.

Not in His Favor

The phenomenal success of Squid Game has completely changed the game for Netflix. The program’s distinctive fusion of suspense, social commentary, and intense competition resonated with audiences all around the world. A rise in Netflix memberships caused by Squid Game’s large global viewership and word-of-mouth publicity increased the company’s value by roughly $1 billion. The success of the show proved the value of global content and maintained Netflix’s position as a top streaming service. Despite Squid Game’s enormous popularity, there has been much debate about Hwang Dong-hyuk’s remuneration, the show’s creator. According to reports, Hwang only received a little upfront payment for his work on Squid Game, leaving him with a disproportionately small profit margin compared to Netflix’s enormous financial success.

The Give and Take

The popularity of Squid Game has sparked a wider debate about how creators are treated in the entertainment business. It draws attention to the power dynamics at play and the necessity of open discussions and fair profit-sharing arrangements. Beyond specific instances, the discussion also raises concerns about the overall equity of the pay systems in the sector. The significance of tackling these issues grows more and more crucial as long as creators continue to be the success factors for platforms and productions. All stakeholders must engage in discussions that result in more equal pay practices as the industry develops in order to maintain an environment that honors and respects the innovative minds behind these productions.

Undoubtedly, Netflix has benefited financially from the Squid Game’s stratospheric rise, which has led to a huge increase in the company’s valuation. The popularity of the program has drawn attention to the problem of creative compensation in the entertainment sector, too. The author of Squid Game only received a small payment, which has generated discussions about the need for more equitable contracts that better recognize creators’ important contributions. It is essential for stakeholders to work toward more equitable remuneration systems as the business develops to make sure that creators are fairly compensated for their originality and vision. The industry can create an atmosphere that promotes and fosters artistic creativity while promoting the rights of creators by addressing these issues.



, ,